LYCEUS / RESEARCH SYSTEM EXPERIMENTAL
~/lyceus / README [ research note 001 ]

research brief / overview

A model exploring
how to keep learning.

Lyceus is an experimental transformer built from scratch. It explores what it would take for a model to change over time—carefully, under supervision, and with a way back.

LYCEUS / RESEARCH NOTESSMALL MODEL · OPEN QUESTIONS · NO PRODUCT CLAIMSEST. 001

01 / ARCHITECTURE

Two domains.
Different ownership.

Personal context and reusable competence should not be treated as the same kind of state. This is the intended design, not a proven privacy boundary.

FIG 01 / OWNERSHIP MODELCONCEPTUAL · NOT TO SCALE
01 / PERSONALUSER-SPECIFIC

Personal state

History and profile belong to the individual. Associative memory and categorized connections are proposed ways to organize context.

historyprofileassociations
02 / SHAREDREUSABLE

Model competence

Reusable capability lives in the model. Editable weights and growth are being explored as supervised changes, not proven general learning.

weightscompetencegrowth
NOTE / 01

Transformer and source changes are intended to be less frequent, eligible only above a configurable model-size threshold and subject to independent tests. The gate is under development—not proof that a change is correct.

02 / CHANGE LIFECYCLE

Propose. Test.
Keep the way back.

A candidate is not a conclusion. The intended lifecycle makes evaluation, persistence and recovery part of model change.

FIG 02 / SUPERVISED UPDATE LOOPPROPOSED DESIGN
  1. 01

    Observe

    Gather a signal.

  2. 02

    Propose

    Describe a change.

  3. 03

    Candidate

    Update or grow.

  4. 04

    Evaluate

    Test independently.

  5. 05

    Persist

    Save a checkpoint.

  6. 06

    Reload

    Restart or roll back.

Recovery is a design goal, not a guarantee.

Independent evaluation, persistent checkpoints, restart and rollback remain work in progress. The prototype does not establish a secure or fully recoverable lifecycle.

[ PLANNED ]

03 / RESEARCH STATUS

Evidence over
assumptions.

A small research model is not a capable assistant. Here is the boundary between what has been tested and what remains to be built.

01 / OBSERVED[ TESTED ]

Small-scale experiments

A from-scratch C++/LibTorch transformer has been trained on public text. Scheduled growth did not improve exposed-development loss against its control in one seed.

A host-scripted synthetic update changed a restricted token answer and reloaded a candidate. This does not prove general learning.

02 / IN PROGRESS[ RESEARCH ]

Integration & safeguards

The model is not a coherent assistant. Memory and online growth integration remain ongoing; the prototype is not autonomous, secure, privacy-preserving, or source-self-modifying.

Its evaluator is not OS-sealed and feedback is not externally authenticated.